Competition law

PART Ⅰ THE OBJECTIVES AND NATURE OF COMPETITION LAW 3

1 Sonya Margaret Willimsky （1997）， ‘The Concept（s） of Competition’， European Competition Law Review， 1， pp.54-7. 3

2 Barry E.Hawk （1988）， ‘The American （Anti-Trust） Revolution： Lessons for the EEC？’， European Competition Law Review， 9， pp.53-87. 7

The Economic Concerns of Competition Law 45

3 Robert H.Lande （1982）， ‘Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust： The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged’， Hastings Law Journal，34， pp.67-151. 45

4 Alex P.Jacquemin （1970）， ‘The Criterion of Economic Performance in the Anti-Trust Policies of the United States and the European Economic Community’，Common Market Law Review， 7， pp.205-25. 131

The Political Concerns of Competition Law 155

5 Robert Pitofsky （1979）， ‘The Political Content of Antitrust’， University of Pennsylvania Law Review， 127， and a Commentary by Louis B.Schwartz entitled “‘Justice” and other Non-Economic Goals of Antitrust’， pp.1051-81. 155

6 Bastiaan van der Esch （1980）， ‘E.E.C.Competition Rules： Basic Principles and Policy Aims’， Legal Issues of European Integration， 2， pp.75-85. 187

The Extraterritoriality Application of Competition Law 201

7 Paul Torremans （1996）， ‘Extraterritorial Application of E.C.and U.S.Competition Law’， European Law Review， 21， pp.280-93. 201

PART Ⅱ THE SCOPE OF COMPETITION LAW 219

Vertical Restraints 219

8 Frank H.Easterbrook （1985）， ‘Vertical Arrangements and the Rule of Reason’，Corporate Counsel’s Annual -1985， pp.461-98. 219

9 Richard A.Posner （1977）， ‘The Rule of Reason and the Economic Approach：Reflections on the Sylvania Decision’， University of Chicago Law Review， 45，pp.1-20. 257

Public Undertakings and State Aids 279

10 Christopher Bright （1993）， ‘Article 90， Economic Policy and the Duties of Member States’， European Competition Law Review， 6， pp.263-72. 279

11 Anthony Gardner （1995）， ‘The Velvet Revolution： Article 90 and the Triumph of the Free Market in Europe’s Regulated Sectors’， European Competition Law Review， 2， pp 78-86. 289

PART Ⅲ SELECTED LEGAL CONCEPTS AND CHALLENGES IN COMPETITION LAW 303

The Rule of Reason and Per Se Rules 303

12 Rudolph J.Peritz （1989）， ‘The “Rule of Reason” in Antitrust Law： Property Logic in Restraint of Competition’， Hastings Law Journal， 40， pp.285-342. 303

13 Richard Whish and Brenda Sufrin （1988）， ‘Article 85 and the Rule of Reason’， Yearbook of European Law， 7， pp.1-38. 361

Dominance， Concerted Practices and Joint Dominance 401

14 Valentine Korah （1980）， ‘Concept of a Dominant Position within the Meaning of Article 86’， Common Market Law Review， 17， pp.395-414. 401

15 Trevor Soames （1996）， ‘An Analysis of the Principles of Concerted Practice and Collective Dominance： A Distinction without a Difference？’， European Competition Law Review， 1， pp.24-39. 421

16 Rosa Greaves （1998）， ‘The Herchel Smith Lecture 1998： Article 86 of the E.C. Treaty and Intellectual Property Rights’， European Intellectual Property Review，20， pp.379-85. 437

Essential Facilities Doctrine 447

17 Daniel Glasl （1994）， ‘Essential Facilities Doctrine in EC Anti-Trust Law： A Contribution to the Current Debate’， European Competition Law Review， 6，pp.306-14. 447

Abuse 459

18 David J.Gerber （1987）， ‘Law and the Abuse of Economic Power in Europe’，Tulane Law Review， 62， pp.57-107. 459

19 Thomas Sharpe （1987）， ‘Predation’， European Competition Law Review， 8，pp.53-76. 511

Efficiency Defence in Mergers 537

20 Pierre-Emmanuel Noel （1997）， ‘Efficiency Considerations in the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers under European and U.S.Antitrust Law’， European Competition Law Review， 8， pp.498-519. 537

PART Ⅳ COMPETITION LAW AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY 561

21 Ignacio De Le6n （1997）， ‘The Dilemma of Regulating International Competition under the WTO System’， European Competition Law Review， 3， pp.162-77. 561

22 Spencer Weber Waller （1994）， ‘Neo-Realism and the International Harmonization of Law： Lessons from Antitrust’， Kansas Law Review， 42， pp.557-604. 577

Name Index 625