- 作 者：THOMAS GIBBONS
- 出 版 社：ASHGATE
- 出版年份：2009
- ISBN：9780754627982
- 标注页数：597 页
- PDF页数：619 页
请阅读订购服务说明与试读!
订购服务说明
1、本站所有的书默认都是PDF格式，该格式图书只能阅读和打印，不能再次编辑。
2、除分上下册或者多册的情况下，一般PDF页数一定要大于标注页数才建议下单购买。【本资源619 ≥597页】
图书下载及付费说明
1、所有的电子图书为PDF格式，支持电脑、手机、平板等各类电子设备阅读；可以任意拷贝文件到不同的阅读设备里进行阅读。
2、电子图书在提交订单后一般半小时内处理完成,最晚48小时内处理完成。(非工作日购买会延迟)
3、所有的电子图书都是原书直接扫描方式制作而成。
PART Ⅰ CONVERGENCE AND REGULATION 3
1 Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem （1996）, ‘New Challenges for European Multimedia Policy: A German Perspective’, European Journal of Communication, 11,pp.327-46. 3
2 Douglas W.Vick （2006）, ‘Regulatory Convergence?’, Legal Studies, 26,pp.26-64. 23
PART Ⅱ TECHNIQUES OF REGULATION 65
3 Cass R.Sunstein （2000）, ‘Television and the Public Interest’, California Law Review, 88, pp.499-564. 65
4 Angela J.Campbell （1999）, ‘Self Regulation and the Media’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 51, pp.711-71. 131
5 Andrew Murray and Colin Scott （2002）, ‘Controlling the New Media: Hybrid Responses to New Forms of Power’, Modern Law Review, 65, pp.491-516. 193
6 Michael D.Birnhack and Jacob H.Rowbottom （2004）, ‘Shielding Children: the European Way’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79, pp.175-227. 219
PART Ⅲ STRUCTURAL REGULATION: MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP 275
7 Rachael Craufurd Smith （2004）, ‘Rethinking European Union Competence in the Field of Media Ownership: The Internal Market, Fundamental Rights and European Citizenship’, European Law Review, 29, pp.652-72. 275
8 Peter Humphreys （1998）, ‘The Goal of Pluralism and the Ownership Rules for Private Broadcasting in Germany: Re-Regulation or De-Regulation?’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 16, pp.527-55. 297
9 Christopher S.Yoo （2005）, ‘Architectural Censorship and the FCC’, South California Law Review, 78, pp.669-731. 327
10 C.Edwin Baker （2005）, ‘Media Structure, Ownership Policy, and the First Amendment’, South California Law Review, 78, pp.733-62. 391
11 Thomas Gibbons （2004）, ‘Control over Technical Bottlenecks - A Case for Media Ownership Law?’, in Regulating Access to Digital Television, Strasbourg:European Audiovisual Observatory, pp.59-67. 421
PART Ⅳ ISSUES IN REGULATING NEW MEDIA 433
12 Heman Galperin and Francois Bar （2002）, ‘The Regulation of Interactive Television in the United States and the European Union’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 55, pp.61-84. 433
13 Natali Helberger （2006）, ‘The “Right to Information” and Digital Broadcasting:About Monsters, Invisible Men and the Future of European Broadcasting Regulation’,Entertainment Law Review, 17, pp.70-80. 457
14 Damien Geradin （2005）, ‘Access to Content by New Media Platforms: A Review of the Competition Law Problems’, European Law Review, 30, pp.68-94. 469
15 Andrew T.Kenyon and Robin Wright （2006）, ‘Television as Something Special?Content Control Technologies and Free-to-air TV’, Melbourne Law Review, 30,pp.338-69. 497
16 Horatia Muir Watt （2003）, ‘Yahoo！ Cyber-collision of Cultures: Who Regulates?’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 24, pp.673-96. 529
17 Eli Noam （1998）, ‘Spectrum Auctions: Yesterday’s Heresy, Today’s Orthodoxy,Tomorrow’s Anachronism.Taking the Next Step to Open Spectrum Access’,Journal of Law and Economics, 41, pp.765-90. 553
18 Thomas W.Hazlett （1998）, ‘Spectrum Flash Dance: Eli Noam’s Proposal for “Open Access” to Radio Waves’, Journal ofLaw and Economics, 41, pp.805-20. 579
Name Index 595